| Papers [85-96] of 11724 :: [Page 8 of 977] | | Go to page : <— 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 —> | |
|
|
The U.S. Constitution, 2008.
This paper explores the debates between the Federalists and the anti-Federalists concerning the drafting of the US Constitution.
2,610 words (approx. 10.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the nature of the constitutional debates between the Federalists and the anti-Federalists that led to the adoption of the US Constitution. The paper offers an understanding of the history both leading up to and during the period of debate. The paper relates that because of the debate that surrounded the document from the start, the terms of the Constitution are ambiguous, flexible and thus always open to debate.
From the Paper
"The Constitution of the United States of America is perhaps the world's oldest written national constitution. Adopted on September 17, 1787, the Constitution is the result of a significant and heated debate between who have become known as Federalist and Anti-Federalist. It was largely due to the arguments and propaganda of these two groups that lead to the final form of the document that was adopted. This debate was far reaching in that it occurred physically both in the various forms of the constitutional conventions and in the streets and homes in the form of editorials."
| |
|
Thai and Philippine Literature, 2008.
A comparison of Thailand's and the Philippines' literature and history.
1,215 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper relates that Thailand willingly accepted different kinds of national and philosophical influences from other nations while the Philippines were subject to foreign control and colonial influence. The paper shows, therefore, how Philippine literature has emerged in a primarily popular and oppositional context unlike Thailand's literature that is from an academic and complementary historical context.
From the Paper
"Thailand and the Philippines provide interesting contrasting studies of East Asian literature because of their unique geographic locations and histories. Thailand in its early incarnation was a kind of crossroads of South East Asian cultural life and it willingly accepted different kinds of national and philosophical influences from other nations. Its traditional literature up to the 19th century encompasses Buddhist, Chinese, and Indian traditions. The Philippines are islands that were subject to foreign control and colonial influence. They were exposed to the influence of other nations not through geographic proximity, but the imposition of foreign ideas and concepts that were supposed to override the voices of its national, indigenous literature."
| |
|
Islam, 2008.
An overview of the rise of Islam.
2,776 words (approx. 11.1 pages), 11 sources, APA, $ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a historical and philosophical review of the rise of Islam together with an overview of the core beliefs of the Islamic faith, a history of the prophet Mohammed, his conquests and the opposition Muslims have had with the papacy. The paper states that part of Islam's success may be attributed to the fervent belief and ardor followers have for the Qu'ran, the sayings of the prophet of Mohammed and their beliefs about their purpose here on earth. The paper concludes that most believers accept common tenants, and the religious doctrine outlined by the prophet Mohammed. This has led to greater unity, and is one reason the rise of Islam took the entire world by storm. The paper reviews these key concepts and arguments.
Outline:
Introduction
Mohammed (570-632)
Conquest (632-732)
Reasons for Success
Opposition to Papacy (600-1054)
Doctrine/Women and Iran
Conclusions
Religion
From the Paper
"The Muslim faith also focuses on the teachings of the Books of Allah, or the Holy Qu'ran. Other books important to the faith include the Taurah, Zaboor and Injeel. These books reflect many parts of the Old and New Testament. Muslims generally accept the existence of prophets. People believe they come to this earth to worship God and live a life that is virtuous and respectable, guided by the divine light. Further, the faith concentrates on the belief that life on this earth is one of "trial" where individuals have the opportunity to test their faith and allegiance to God . Anyone following the full doctrine of God will be rewarded in the afterlife, while those who do not follow God's doctrine are condemned to live eternally in Hell. Muslim's believe in destiny and in the divine decree or ability of God to plan life and execute life in the best way possible."
| |
|
Edward Gibbon, 2008.
This paper discusses the life and works of Roman Empire historian Edward Gibbon.
1,567 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 6 sources, APA, $ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper relates that Edward Gibbon's "History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" has impacted much of history including the development of the American Republic. The paper looks at Gibbon's background and discusses Gibbon's beliefs on how it was possible that Rome had been such a dominant force in the ancient world for more than a millennium. The paper concludes that it may be worthwhile for us today to review Gibbon's work to determine the similarities between that time and now and what the future may bring.
From the Paper
"When names of historians are mentioned, it is rare that Edward Gibbon Wakefield is among them. Perhaps for those historians or individuals who study this particular area he is recognized, but for others he either remains nameless or as a footnote. Even those who have studied the man and his times have many unanswered questions. Yet, his History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire has impacted much of history including the development of the American Republic."
| |
|
The Soviet-Afghanistan War, 2008.
A review of the role played by the Afghan resistance in the Soviet-Afghanistan war.
1,823 words (approx. 7.3 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses and analyzes the topic of the Soviet-Afghanistan War. Specifically it analyzes the Afghan resistance in the Soviet-Afghanistan War, including the factions, leaders, and external connections. The paper states that throughout the war, the mujahidin rebel forces repeatedly outfoxed the Soviet troops, leading to a war that dragged on for ten years, which many call "Russia's Vietnam." More than 25,000 Soviet troops were killed during the war, and the loss to guerilla fighters undermined the Soviet military and public opinion.
Outline:
Origins of the War
The War Itself
The Players
The Aftermath of the War
From the Paper
"In the 1970s, Afghanistan was still a monarchy, and many of its leaders, who followed Marxism and Maoism instead, did not support Islam. However, of the approximately 12 million people living in the country, 90 percent claimed alliance to the Sunni Muslim sect. In addition, the country relied heavily on the Soviet Union for survival. However, all that would begin to change in 1973, when the monarchy toppled and a new leader took power. One historian writes, "In July 1973 Prince Muhammad Daud, a former prime minister and cousin of the Afghan King Zahir Shah, overthrew the government, abolished the monarchy, and proclaimed himself president of Afghanistan." Daud ruled for five years, until he was overthrown by a coup operated by the very small People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA). Many people felt the coup was at least partly supported by the Soviet Union. Ultimately, the group created so many reforms that chipped away at long-held Afghan social and cultural traditions that anarchy spread throughout the country."
| |
|
WWII Women Pilots, 2008.
A review of the reasons, involvement, and necessity of training women pilots during World War II.
902 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The essay describes the origin, the need, the activities and the part played by women pilots in flying aircraft during World War II.
From the Paper
"The women, although only civil servants, wore uniforms and served bravely. They had been promised military status, but when male pilots began returning from the war, there were some complaints that women had usurped their jobs as pilots. Women pilots who served in the war effort during World War II were not granted veteran's benefits until more than thirty years later. In deference to the mens' need for jobs, many of the women returned to traditional roles. At the end of the war, thousands of American women were dismissed from military service under a mandate passed in the early forties that had initially encouraged their participation."
| |
|
American Revolution, 2008.
A recounting of the history of the American revolution which was the basis for American independence.
1,796 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the American revolution when the American states won their battles with Britain during the 170's. The paper speaks of the French involvement and their superiority to the British army. The paper also discusses the "Article of the Federation" and the failures of the document. The paper continues with the parts played by the "Federal" and and the "Constitutional Convention" which became the basis of the "Founding Fathers Groups", the forerunner of the United States of America.
From the Paper
"The first Treaty of Paris was in 1763. This was at the end of the Seven Years War and would see French power diminished greatly. The treaty transferred New France to the British Empire. When France later entered the Revolutionary War on the side of the rebels, some thought this was a matter of revenge for losing Canada to the British. The French helped the Americans win the war, but the cost was high and damaging to the French treasury. The second Treaty of Paris ended the American Revolutionary War in 1783. The treaty was also largely about territory and about dividing up North American that was then under the control of the Americans, the British, and the French. The dividing line in the north separated Canada from the United States and left Quebec to the French. The region of Nova Scotia was not so clearly defined and would not be for some time, after more tension between France and Britain. The change effected in the New World would have a major effect on France thereafter and would lead directly to the French Revolution in 1789."
| |
|
Common Sense and the American Crisis, 2008.
A review of the paper "Common Sense and the American Crisis'' by Thomas Paine, in which he outlines his views on the government's relationship to society and the need for patriotism.
1,247 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the fact that the actions of men of honor manage to change history, the lives of the people, and the culture of the nations. The paper further states that such men are well remembered and celebrated each year and that Thomas Paine is one such character. The paper continues further that Paine's most famous pamphlet, "Common sense and the American crisis", comes to prove the importance that one document may have in the writing of the history of a country. The paper discusses the point that the pamphlet represented the first clear request for independence from the British crown. An annotated bibliography is included with the paper.
From the Paper
"Despite the shape of the discourse, the public it takes into account or the personal background of the author, Thomas Paine's "Common sense" is above all a text meant to educate people in terms of freedom, equal rights and democracy. At least, this is the general idea promoted by the US as its national creed. However, there are those that deny the existence of such lofty goals and question the truth behind this demagogic formula. Kaye points out that "Paine's Common Sense explained to the Americans, north and south, urban and rural, high and low, enlightened and evangelical, what they were fighting against and what they were fighting for (...) he firmly believed that America possessed extraordinary potential but he did not see that potential as belonging to America itself."
| |
|
An Overview of American Sports, 2008.
An overview of the history and preferences within American sports of today.
1,850 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the history and development of sports from the ancient Greek ideal of sports to American sports of today. It specifically discusses collective versus individual sports in America and the values of playing sports for fun compared to competitive sports. The paper also briefly looks at the general differences between male and female sports.
From the Paper
"The most popular spectator sports today are collective sports, much in line with the English ideal--baseball, basketball, and football. Even the much despised soccer is popular amongst American youths. Yet Americans cheer on their favorite individual stars in all of these sports, especially if the starts engage in charity efforts to justify their bloated salaries. The tension remains about what good sports do for both the individual or society, and Americans today are clearly using sports as a means of practical self-improvement like the Greeks as well as a means of collective identification like the English: "in the 1950's or 1960's, few people exercised; baseline fitness-consciousness was just above zero. Today, 20% of the U.S. population works out on a regular basis, while an additional 60%+ can be classified as...'Consciousness III'--those persuaded of physical fitness, but who by their own admission, don't get enough exercise. As behavior lags enlightened attitudes, 4 out of 5 adult Americans are true believers in exercise and fitness." But the protests remain that Americans are too busy to exercise, too busy working to do something as decadent as work on their bodies for either the individual or the collective good."
| |
|
Ronald Reagan Presidential Analysis, 2008.
An analysis of Ronald Reagan's time in the White House.
1,395 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, APA, $ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the presidency of Ronald Reagan, including his rise to power in the mid 1970s and the legacy left behind by his term in office. The author notes in his paper how Reagan is remembered by all, regardless of their affiliation, for his charismatic leadership.
Outline:
Reagan, Ronald - Presidential Overview
Primary political platform.
State of the nation prior to presidency.
What Carter, Nixon and Ford lacked.
The Crisis Bringing Reagan to Power
The Iranian Hostage Crisis.
Distress Followers Would Face
Economic burden and budget deficit.
Welfare reforms.
Reagan's Personal Goals & Achievements
Reaganomics.
Help cut taxes and increase American pride and honor.
End Cold War.
Ronald Reagan the Legacy
Personal perspectives on Reagan
Conclusions
From the Paper
"The crisis situation resulting in Ronald Reagan's rise to power was the Iranian Hostage event. In 1979 the ruler or Shah of Iran was overthrown by fundamentalist Muslims, younger citizens, college-age students that stormed the US embassy in Tehran and took US hostages, holding them for 444 days (Cannon, 2001; Sharpe & Pemberton, 1998; Henry & Ritter, 1992). This whole event occurred at the end of Jimmy Carter's first term in office, and became a very serious issue in the following election. Ultimately, Ronald Reagan won a very big victory because of this. Ronald did run a couple of times however for President before coming to office. His first loss was in 1976 when he ran against Ford; however, this time Reagan had a strong defense platform, and a campaign he focused on the return of "America to greatness" which helped build his power, reputation and campaign (Young, 2004, p. 18)."
| |
|
The American Revolution War and the War of 1812, 2008.
A look at the role of the British marines during the American Revolution and the War of 1812.
3,167 words (approx. 12.7 pages), 7 sources, APA, $ 91.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper states that in order to give a complete account of the events of the War of 1812, and the role played by the naval forces, the paper highlights the major battles the two main combatants were engaged in, and their outcomes for each side, with special focus on the role of the British marines. The paper states that the War of 1812 was essential in the economy of the relationship between the US and Britain. The paper analyzes the major battles and their implications, as well as the practical outcome this confrontation represented for the English. The paper also offers a a wide view on the overall process of independence for the US. The paper concludes with a discussion of the role of the British naval forces during this time.
From the Paper
"Any independence war, as the American Revolution came to be known in history, is a rather complex affair, engaging all the forces at the disposal of the parts. The Americans, eager to break apart from the British rule and establish themselves as an independent, free, and national state, made use of all the means at their disposal in order to defeat their ruler. On the other hand, the British had both a territory to control and a prestige to defend. The US colonies were a true asset for the Empire, taking into account the enormous economic perspectives lying ahead for the young states. On the other hand, the British were, at the time, the most important colonial power in the world, a reputation that had to be kept and protected from any attempt of undermining. All these aspects however cannot be pointed out without a proper presentation of the historical background that led to the burst of the American Revolution and the subsequent military developments, including the 1812 war."
| |
|
Social History-New History, 2008.
A look at new history and multiculturalism within the context of historical studies in Britain.
2,739 words (approx. 11.0 pages), 11 sources, MLA, $ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the conception of 'new history" or 'history from below' and states that it has its foundations in a wide range of connected disciplines and contemporary theoretical trajectories and stances. The paper comments that the foundation of 'history from below' lies in the questioning of the hegemony of old and more elitist views of history and the context of historical reality The paper concludes that the writing of 'history from below' provides a much-needed and important part of historical research and discourse in contemporary scholarship.
Outline:
Introduction and Overview
British Multiculturalism
Conclusion
From the Paper
" In conclusion it should be noted that the "new history" and the stance that takes its point of departure from 'below" in Britain owes much to the earlier Marxist historians. These historians are in fact seen as the "progenitors" of contemporary "history from below." (Kaye 182) Given this legacy in the British context it is not surprising that much of the historical research has been focused on the marginalized and disenfranchised cultures and sections of the population.
"For example there has been a great deal of research on the Asian and Pakistan immigration to the country. After the Second World War there was a large scale immigration of Muslims from various counties including North Africa to Britain. The central reason for this was the need in Britain for cheap industrial labor and they "...turned towards their former colonies in South Asia and North Africa to fill labour shortages... (What perspectives for Islam and Muslims in Europe?) Research into this area has produced numerous studies dealing with the prejudice and the alienation that these immigrants experienced. This type of research clearly shows the link and the connection between 'history from below' and multiculturalism and also suggests that these two concepts are inextricably intertwinwed in this new approach to history. While there are many detractors and critics of this new historical approach, there are also many who see 'new history' as advancing the aims of the discipline."
|
|
|
