| Papers [145-156] of 2060 :: [Page 13 of 172] | | Go to page : <— 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 —> | |
|
|
The Ethical Obligations of Corporations, 2008.
This paper debates the moral and ethical obligations of corporations in modern society.
2,970 words (approx. 11.9 pages), 7 sources, MLA, $ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper consists of two parts. Part I of the paper shows how corporations make decisions on the assumption that injury and death to innocent people is an acceptable cost for profits. The paper looks at the Ford Motor Company that did not reveal that their Pinto model had a gas tank that could explode and burn. The paper argues that the rise in white-collar crime is linked to the materialist, consumerist nature of our society, which is reflected in our legal systems. Part II of the paper analyzes these kinds of behaviors by applying normative theories to them. The paper shows how neither utilitarian, deontological nor virtue ethics theories can give a clear and definitive answer to the question of whether Ford made a correct choice.
From the Paper
"An example of corporations putting profit before any other consideration may be found in the case of the Ford Motor Company. This company decided at one time to keep quiet about the fact that their Pinto model had a gas tank that tended to explode and burn in the event of a rear end collision. This of course resulted in injury to people inside the vehicles, and sometimes even death. Ford's reasoning was that it would be more profitable to settle resultant law suits than to recall the faulty vehicles. (Samuelson) It is important to note that this decision was not classified as a crime, even though one might expect it to be. It is argued in this essay that the reasons for this kind of thinking (both the decision Ford made, and the fact that it was not classified as a crime) go right to the root of the nature and values of our society, which in turn are reflected in our legal systems."
| |
|
Suicide in America, 2008.
This paper evaluates the ethics and morality of suicide within modern American society.
1,210 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This study examines the ethical and moral arguments that support or decline the validity of suicide within modern American society. By examining the role of assisted suicide for suffering patients, the autonomy of a person's own body argues that the law has no right to interfere with the rational taking of one's own life. In contrast, the writer maintains that the morality of the law often denies a person's self-autonomy due to the religious and ethical background of the American legal apparatus. In essence, these two contradicting points of view are analyzed within this ethical and moral evaluation of suicide in modern American society.
From the Paper
"Although the law makes it possible for a person to terminate life with the consent of a family member, the issue of self-autonomy and the right to life is deferred on religious morality and within the criterion of the Hippocratic Oath that many doctors adhere to in their medical code of ethics. These are the major factors that define how American law perceives suicide and how it can be dine within the parameters of social morality and ethical standards. Often, the basis of religious or medical ethics provide the legal standards that often enforce a lack of self-autonomy on the part of patient's to choose their own suicide. By understanding the basis of law, one can now examine the counter arguments for suicide that detail the right to live or die through a person's own bodily autonomy."
| |
|
Martha Stewart's Unethical Behavior, 2008.
This paper discusses the serious ethical lapses of Martha Stewart.
983 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 8 sources, MLA, $ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper describes Martha Stewart's insider trading when she sold her stock in the ImClone company. The paper details her subsequent denial and deceit. The paper discusses how under any ethical system; from a normative perspective, a utilitarian point of view and a deontological standpoint, Stewart acted wrongly.
From the Paper
"On December 27, 2001, Sam Waksal, the key shareholder in ImClone, ordered his broker to sell all his stock in the company. The broker, who was also Martha Stewart's broker, told his assistant to phone Stewart. The assistant left Stewart a message about Waksal's sales, suggesting she might do the same. Stewart called the broker back and ordered him to sell.
"ImClone stock plummeted and Waksal was investigated. The SEC learned of Stewart's sale, and called Stewart to a formal interview. Before the interview, Stewart and her broker conspired. Rather than admitting that the broker gave Stewart an inside tip, they invented a story of a "standing sell order." Stewart gave this story to the government in formal interviews. After a lengthy investigation, Stewart on various charges on June 4, 2002, although not for insider trading."
| |
|
Aviation Disasters, 2008.
An analysis of whether the families of plane crash victims have been treated fairly over the last 15 years.
2,366 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 13 sources, APA, $ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
There are few things more tragic than the unexpected loss of a loved one. With this in mind, this paper looks at how the grieving families of plane crash victims have been treated by the National Transportation Safety Board, by the airline industry, by the courts, and by the United States government over the course of the last 15 years. In so doing, it hopes to illustrate that many of the pertinent authorities have frequently fallen short in satisfying their ethical and moral obligations to the loved ones of crash victims - and towards the memory of those who perished.
From the Paper
"In some important respects, recent history shows that the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has not always well-served the families of those who lost their lives in jetliner crashes. For example, victims' families have frequently complained that the NTSB has done a poor job of keeping them informed about the progress of investigations. At the same time, the surviving loved ones of crash victims have often expressed displeasure at the fact that airlines have made families wait for hours before confirming that a brother, sister, mother, father, grandparent was on-board a downed jetliner ("Helping the Families," 1996). "
| |
|
Active and Passive Euthanasia, 2008.
This paper discusses active and passive euthanasia in Canada and the implications for nursing.
1,138 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 4 sources, APA, $ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper contends that active euthanasia should never be legalized because it is morally wrong. The paper explores passive euthanasia, which is generally accepted when it is clear that a person wants to have no extraordinary measures taken to prolong his/her life. The paper discusses how nurses must be familiar with the complexities of euthanasia. The paper explains that a request for active euthanasia can result in a serious ethical dilemma for the nurse who is unprepared and who has not determined a personal ethical stance.
From the Paper
"Active euthanasia and assisted suicide will very probably never be legalized in Canada. I agree because the ethical principle relating to autonomy is violated in cases of assisted suicide, irrespective of whether or not the patient's consent is given. The view of the Canadian government on assisted suicide has been clear through the 1993 case of Sue Rodriguez. This woman was suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease and requested the right to assisted suicide. A painful death was inevitable and she wished official approval of her eventual need for assisted suicide. The government's decision can be viewed in two ways. First of all, as stated by the court, "Fundamental justice required that a fair balance be struck between the interests of the state and those of the individual" (Kondro, 1993, p. 918). The principle at work was justice and determining what was the best course for all individuals. Assisted suicide, if legalized, can lead to abuse. The other viewpoint is that the court's decision was based on a slippery slope or fear of possible negative outcomes."
| |
|
Whistleblowing: Right or Wrong?, 2008.
A discussion on the ethics of whistleblowing.
1,279 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, $ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses some of the ethical issues related to the popular concept of whistleblowing. Whistleblowing in this context means that an employee reports company misconduct or illegalities, which would otherwise be unknown, outside of company circles, to the public or to a government entity. The paper examines how it is among the most frequently seen and controversial issues in business today and how regardless of the industry or job one is involved in, one has a chance of encountering a situation in which whistleblowing may present itself as an option.
Outline:
Significant Impact
Low / Minimal Impact
Conclusion: Blow the Whistle or Remain Silent?
From the Paper
"Another famous whistleblowing case study is that of Dr. Jeffrey Wigand. Dr. Wigand was a former head of research at tobacco company Brown & Williamson. In 1996, he revealed to the media that his company had added chemicals such as ammonia to its cigarettes to increase their delivery of the addictive drug nicotine. He faced lawsuits and even death threats, but persisted in his revelations via a national television interview ("Caslon Analytics whistle-blowing cases"). Dr. Wigand's story is perhaps best known to the general public in the form of the film based on it, The Insider. The impact of this particular case of whistleblowing upon society is unimaginable, given the large numbers of people use smoke cigarettes and the already well known health dangers associated with the practice. "
| |
|
Mill's Utilitarianism, 2007.
This paper examines John Stuart Mill's beliefs of utilitarianism.
795 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, $ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper relates that Plato, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill each advocated ethical systems based upon their interpretations of society and human nature. The paper is of the opinion that Mill's utilitarianism can be applied more effectively in the modern world than Plato's or Kant's ethical systems. The paper discusses Mill's views and concludes that despite justified criticism of some aspects of utilitarianism, it is the best of the three systems.
From the Paper
"John Stuart Mill believed that there are two basic characteristics of human nature: an instinct to please God and our fellow human beings, and a fear of displeasing God and our fellow human beings. Infused in these characteristics is an internal motivation based upon a sense of duty, which consists of religious feelings, childhood experiences, sympathy, and self-worth. This sense of duty is founded on the evidence that most human beings experience remorse when they attempt to reject these elements of their sense of duty by not promoting or contributing to general happiness. That sense of duty is subjective and emerges with experience. (Mill)"
| |
|
White Slavery, 2008.
This paper discusses the issue of human trafficking and looks at the moral dilemma of white slavery.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, $ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses that when speaking of slavery in twentieth century terms, this often refers to persons of European decent or "whites" being sold into involuntary servitude or slavery. The writer explains that white slavery encompasses a variety of methods and means, many of which are as equally inhumane or perhaps more so than traditional slavery. The writer notes that human trafficking is a lucrative business around the world and provides tremendous revenue for those performing the illegal acts. The writer then points out that the greatest argument by proponents for this type of illegal activity is the monetary gain of the activity, but these individuals fail or refuse to see the negative and potentially irreversible effects. The writer maintains that human slavery is not only mentally and physically detrimental but also signifies a breakdown in the morality of society. The writer concludes that although slavery was legally abolished in the nineteenth century, it is still around in the twentieth century and one must continue to work towards a society that is free from the misuse and mistreatment of others.
Outline:
Sexual Trafficking
Immigrants & Bonded Labor
Arranged Marriages
Illegal Adoption
Regulation
From the Paper
"Human trafficking and slavery takes place and a variety of economically advantageous areas. Every year people are sold into slavery or bondage for such despicable acts such as sexual trafficking, bonded labor, forced marriages and illegal adoptions. These issues are just the tip of the iceberg but are the most proliferate and common activities. At first glance many of these issues and activities seem to be legal, with individuals capable of making sound, logical decisions, but when one examines the true facts it appears that many of these situations have been accomplished through manipulation of the victims."
| |
|
Workplace Dating Morals, 2007.
This paper discusses whether it is morally acceptable for an employer to make rules against dating in the workplace.
1,000 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 3 sources, APA, $ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that the work-oriented culture of today's society has increased the prevalence of office romances. Long hours spent together at the workplace, exacerbated by the lack of time to spend on outside activities, often serve as a springboard for these types of relationships. However, the writer points out that with these relationships come certain liabilities for the associated employer. The writer discusses that forbidding fraternization between employees raises questions of discrimination as well as privacy issues. The writer then looks at the issue of possible no dating policies in the workplace. The writer concludes that the most moral solution would be one that is able to give employers protection against the risks they face with employee dating, while also allowing employees the freedom to live their lives outside the workplace.
Outline:
Abstract
Introduction
Morality Overview
Employer Interests
Are No Dating Policies Morally Acceptable?
Recommendation
From the Paper
"As noted earlier, there are significant downside risks for employers who have employees involved in inter-office relationships. Increased incidence of co-worker complaints of favoritism and the resultant negative effect on the team atmosphere and productivity coupled with possible reduced productivity from the employees involved are all significant concerns for an organization. In today's hyper-competitive, increasingly globalized world, these factors could significantly impact a company's bottom line with reduced competitiveness in their industry."
"In addition, allowing employee dating opens the organization up to an increased chance of sexual harassment lawsuits."
| |
|
Capital Punishment, 2007.
Presents argumenta against capital punishment.
1,175 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, $ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper contends that, since the main issue in the debate over capital punishment hinges on whether killing is a morally justified response to criminal conduct, capital punishment simply cannot be considered acceptable on moral grounds. The paper argues that the death penalty is an old barbaric practice that is immoral, unfair to minorities, simply does not deter crime, and should be discontinued except in a very small minority of cases.
From the Paper
"Capital punishment should be outlawed because it denies a citizen his or her Constitutional right to due process of law. The imposition of capital punishment is arbitrary and irrevocable. It forever deprives an individual of potential benefits of new evidence or new laws that might warrant the reversal of a conviction or the setting aside of a death sentence, and violates a citizen's constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the laws, for studies have proven that capital punishment is applied randomly at best and discriminatorily at worst. It is imposed disproportionately, and many would say in a racist manner, upon those whose victims are white, on offenders who are people of color, and on those who are poor and uneducated."
| |
|
Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibilities, 2007.
An analysis of business ethics and corporate social responsibility within an organization's value system.
846 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, $ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the similarities between business ethics and corporate social responsibility. It discusses business ethics and corporate social responsibility in terms of an organization's value system. It concludes that not only are they similar expressions of corporate and organizational behavior, but business ethics are derived from corporate social responsibility.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
Overview
Corporate Governance
The Ethics of Social Responsibility
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Clearly, as the board of an organization, in tandem with the organization's executive leadership, begins to design a corporate social responsibility program, they must first refer to the company's own ethical character. Before a company can begin a program to institute green policies, for example, or implement a community based job training program, it must be in compliance with the regulatory policies that govern its financial reporting and compliance requirements. Indeed, researchers such as Riley, (2006, p.20), believe that business ethics is simply a component of corporate social responsibility and describes business ethics as an expression of how the organization treats people: employees, competitors, or otherwise."
| |
|
Corporate Stock Options, 2007.
An analysis of the impact of stock option scandals on corporate ethics.
3,726 words (approx. 14.9 pages), 17 sources, APA, $ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the stock options scandal associated with Enron and discusses its impact on corporate ethics. It looks at some of the effects that are expected to arise from this scandal and discusses the ethical character of management in the business sphere. The paper presents a careful overview of business ethics and offers an opinion on the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation in the United States vis-a-vis this current scandal enveloping many public companies across North America.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
Introduction
Stock Options Scandal
Ethical Positions
Future Ramifications
Conclusions
From the Paper
"It seems the entire body of corporate America is holding its collective breath to see how the more than 80 investigations currently underway by the SEC are concluded. Such a host of companies are taking pre-emptive action in the stock options scandal by restating and revising earnings statements that it is clear the problem is even far more pervasive than currently thought. Not only companies like Apple and UnitedHealth are under investigation but McAfee and even Barnes and Noble are being examined by the SEC (Should, 2006). Should any of the top executives at these firms be negatively affected, the resulting impact on their company's share price could depress the entire U.S. stock market in a way that Enron never did and certainly bleed over into the Canadian markets."
|
|
|
